In stroke patients, successful neurorehabilitation depends on the positive interaction of both brain hemispheres. Similarly, in neuroscience, transformative translational research is based on technical and clinical experts collaborating at eye level. Doctors need to step out of their comfort zone to understand technical functionalities. But this does not mean trusting technology blindly.
As a neuropsychologist, I focus on how to ameliorate cognitive impairments after brain injury, such as neglect. Neglect means that a person is not able anymore to direct attention to one side of reality – typically the left side after a right-hemispheric stroke - a prime example of this being that they would only eat up the left side of a plate or not look left before crossing a road. If we take this very serious condition metaphorically, we could say that sometimes translational researchers also neglect vital aspects when developing new patient treatments: Clinicians that fail to see how much technology experts can contribute to better patient care or engineers who do not bother with medical knowledge.
You can't take good research collaboration between doctors and engineers for granted, of course. When it works, it seems easy enough. But it needs an effort, a conscious re-focusing and paying attention to the other. This is easier in institutions that specifically create an interface for medicine and engineering to develop common research projects. Promoting this on-par dialogue can create a closed loop system, where patient care prompts good research questions and research results feed back seamlessly into patient care.
Starting off the dialogue as a clinician or an engineer needs a bit of humility towards your own role, being open to learn from each other and work towards creating a common ground for understanding. So, it's not about talking in purely clinical or purely technical terms that would not make sense to the other. Clinicians should be more aware of the importance of conducting technically innovative research. Biomedical engineering researchers should realize that clinicians can give them very important input on what is relevant, what aspect needs to be addressed.
To say that this is always coordinated and perfectly functioning is utopic. But it can work. The ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research in Bern is a good example for this. Here, we are doing things that would not be possible without this close collaboration. So, it is quite something that the same interdisciplinary research group can be led by technical and clinical heads, working in synergy on gerontechnology and rehabilitation. I am aware that this complete integration is quite a luxury, clinical access usually being more difficult.